Anbytarforum
Särskilda ämnen & övrigt => Discussions in English => General questions => Ämnet startat av: Victoria Cihla skrivet 2021-09-23, 20:49
-
Can anyone help me with the circled section (for Gashult Norrgård) on the attached 1702 tax record?
Mantalslängder 1642-1820 Kronobergs län 1642-1820 (G) 44 (1702) Image 1650 / Page 2465
https://app.arkivdigital.se/volume/v840168a?image=1650&page=2465
v840168a.b1650.s2465
I think I have most of it but mainly need help with the ?'s, but, if I have misunderstood anything, please correct me!
ibm ? (same place (Gashult)) Widower ?
Johan and wife, widow Swenborg
ktt (soldier) Swen's? wife - he is is soldier in a temporary unit in a Three-männing regiment.
ktt soldier Lars unmarried
? soldier Jons wife destitute
What is the word that is in larger letters in front of the above mentioned soldier names? or is that another soldier name?
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks very much,
Vicki
-
I think all is correct. The words before the soldiers are first "Stuf.a" and I'm not sure what that would be short for. Stuf- or Styv- means "step" as in stepfather, stepsister and so on. But in this case, maybe "stuvsönerna", the stepsons? The other word is short for förlovad, retired.
-
Thank you very much, Kalle!
Your help is much appreciated,
Vicki
-
Isn't it 'Stufva' for stuga/cottage? And before that an abbreviation for soldat/soldier?
-
thanks, Ulf!
That is interesting. So it is the soldier's cottage maybe? it is still part of Gashult?
i appreciate your help,
Vicki
-
Yes, it is Gashult.
According to Centrala Soldatregistret there is a soldier Lars Svensson for Gashult rote. Enlisted 1701, died 1703.
-
Thank you, Ulf.
It looks like he is the one - in 1704 tax record, if I'm reading it correctly, he is no longer there and his spot is vacant? Agree? He was still listed in 1703 tax record.
Mantalslängder 1642-1820 Kronobergs län 1642-1820 (G) 46 (1704) Image 980 / Page 2153
https://app.arkivdigital.se/volume/v840170?image=980&page=2153
v840170.b980.s2153
I will look into it further!
Thanks again,
Vicki
-
Correct